PowerSystems.Service
Formulations
Services
(or ancillary services) are models used to ensure that there is necessary support to the power grid from generators to consumers, in order to ensure reliable operation of the system.
The most common application for ancillary services are reserves, i.e., generation (or load) that is not currently being used, but can be quickly made available in case of unexpected changes of grid conditions, for example a sudden loss of load or generation.
A key challenge of adding services to a system, from a mathematical perspective, is specifying which units contribute to the specified requirement of a service, that implies the creation of new variables (such as reserve variables) and modification of constraints.
In this documentation, we first specify the available Services
in the grid, and what requirements impose in the system, and later we discuss the implication on device formulations for specific units.
Table of contents
RangeReserve
StepwiseCostReserve
GroupReserve
RampReserve
NonSpinningReserve
ConstantMaxInterfaceFlow
VariableMaxInterfaceFlow
- Changes on Expressions
RangeReserve
PowerSimulations.RangeReserve
— TypeStruct for to add reserves to be larger than a specified requirement
For each service $s$ of the model type RangeReserve
the following variables are created:
Variables:
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Default proportional cost: $1.0 / \text{SystemBasePower}$
- Symbol: $r_{d}$ for $d$ in contributing devices to the service $s$ If slacks are enabled:
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Default proportional cost: 1e5
- Symbol: $r^\text{sl}$
Depending on the PowerSystems.jl
type associated to the RangeReserve
formulation model, the parameters are:
Static Parameters
- $\text{PF}$ =
PowerSystems.get_max_participation_factor(service)
For a ConstantReserve
PowerSystems
type:
- $\text{Req}$ =
PowerSystems.get_requirement(service)
Time Series Parameters
For a VariableReserve
PowerSystems
type:
Parameter | Default Time Series Name |
---|---|
RequirementTimeSeriesParameter | requirement |
Relevant Methods:
- $\mathcal{D}_s$ =
PowerSystems.get_contributing_devices(system, service)
: Set (vector) of all contributing devices to the service $s$ in the system.
Objective:
Add a large proportional cost to the objective function if slack variables are used $+ r^\text{sl} \cdot 10^5$. In addition adds the default cost for ActivePowerReserveVariables
as a proportional cost.
Expressions:
Adds the ActivePowerReserveVariable
for upper/lower bound expressions of contributing devices.
For ReserveUp
types, the variable is added to ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB
, such that this expression considers both the ActivePowerVariable
and its reserve variable. Similarly, For ReserveDown
types, the variable is added to ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB
, such that this expression considers both the ActivePowerVariable
and its reserve variable
Example: for a thermal unit $d$ contributing to two different ReserveUp
$s_1, s_2$ services (e.g. Reg-Up and Spin):
\[\text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB}_{t} = p_t^\text{th} + r_{s_1,t} + r_{s_2, t} \le P^\text{th,max}\]
similarly if $s_3$ is a ReserveDown
service (e.g. Reg-Down):
\[\text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB}_{t} = p_t^\text{th} - r_{s_3,t} \ge P^\text{th,min}\]
Constraints:
A RangeReserve implements two fundamental constraints. The first is that the sum of all reserves of contributing devices must be larger than the RangeReserve
requirement. Thus, for a service $s$:
\[\sum_{d\in\mathcal{D}_s} r_{d,t} + r_t^\text{sl} \ge \text{Req},\quad \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\} \quad \text{(for a ConstantReserve)} \\ \sum_{d\in\mathcal{D}_s} r_{d,t} + r_t^\text{sl} \ge \text{RequirementTimeSeriesParameter}_{t},\quad \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\} \quad \text{(for a VariableReserve)}\]
In addition, there is a restriction on how much each contributing device $d$ can contribute to the requirement, based on the max participation factor allowed.
\[r_{d,t} \le \text{Req} \cdot \text{PF} ,\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}_s, \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\} \quad \text{(for a ConstantReserve)} \\ r_{d,t} \le \text{RequirementTimeSeriesParameter}_{t} \cdot \text{PF}\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}_s, \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\}, \quad \text{(for a VariableReserve)}\]
StepwiseCostReserve
Service must be used with ReserveDemandCurve
PowerSystems.jl
type. This service model is used to model ORDC (Operating Reserve Demand Curve) in ERCOT.
PowerSimulations.StepwiseCostReserve
— TypeStruct for to add reserves to be larger than a variable requirement depending of costs
For each service $s$ of the model type ReserveDemandCurve
the following variables are created:
Variables:
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Symbol: $r_{d}$ for $d$ in contributing devices to the service $s$
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Symbol: $\text{req}$
Time Series Parameters
For a ReserveDemandCurve
PowerSystems
type:
| Parameter | Default Time Series Name |
Relevant Methods:
- $\mathcal{D}_s$ =
PowerSystems.get_contributing_devices(system, service)
: Set (vector) of all contributing devices to the service $s$ in the system.
Objective:
The ServiceRequirementVariable
is added as a piecewise linear cost based on the decreasing offers listed in the variable_cost
time series. These decreasing cost represent the scarcity prices of not having sufficient reserves. For example, if the variable $\text{req} = 0$, then a really high cost is paid for not having enough reserves, and if $\text{req}$ is larger, then a lower cost (or even zero) is paid.
Expressions:
Adds the ActivePowerReserveVariable
for upper/lower bound expressions of contributing devices.
For ReserveUp
types, the variable is added to ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB
, such that this expression considers both the ActivePowerVariable
and its reserve variable. Similarly, For ReserveDown
types, the variable is added to ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB
, such that this expression considers both the ActivePowerVariable
and its reserve variable
Example: for a thermal unit $d$ contributing to two different ReserveUp
$s_1, s_2$ services (e.g. Reg-Up and Spin):
\[\text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB}_{t} = p_t^\text{th} + r_{s_1,t} + r_{s_2, t} \le P^\text{th,max}\]
similarly if $s_3$ is a ReserveDown
service (e.g. Reg-Down):
\[\text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB}_{t} = p_t^\text{th} - r_{s_3,t} \ge P^\text{th,min}\]
Constraints:
A StepwiseCostReserve
implements a single constraint, such that the sum of all reserves of contributing devices must be larger than the ServiceRequirementVariable
variable. Thus, for a service $s$:
\[\sum_{d\in\mathcal{D}_s} r_{d,t} \ge \text{req}_t,\quad \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\} \]
GroupReserve
Service must be used with ConstantReserveGroup
PowerSystems.jl
type. This service model is used to model an aggregation of services.
PowerSimulations.GroupReserve
— TypeStruct to add reserves to be larger than a specified requirement for an aggregated collection of services
For each service $s$ of the model type GroupReserve
the following variables are created:
Variables:
No variables are created, but the services associated with the GroupReserve
must have created variables.
Static Parameters
- $\text{Req}$ =
PowerSystems.get_requirement(service)
Relevant Methods:
- $\mathcal{S}_s$ =
PowerSystems.get_contributing_services(system, service)
: Set (vector) of all contributing services to the group service $s$ in the system. - $\mathcal{D}_{s_i}$ =
PowerSystems.get_contributing_devices(system, service_aux)
: Set (vector) of all contributing devices to the service $s_i$ in the system.
Objective:
Does not modify the objective function, besides the changes to the objective function due to the other services associated to the group service.
Expressions:
No changes, besides the changes to the expressions due to the other services associated to the group service.
Constraints:
A GroupReserve implements that the sum of all reserves of contributing devices, of all contributing services, must be larger than the GroupReserve
requirement. Thus, for a GroupReserve
service $s$:
\[\sum_{d\in\mathcal{D}_{s_i}} \sum_{i \in \mathcal{S}_s} r_{d,t} \ge \text{Req},\quad \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\} \]
RampReserve
PowerSimulations.RampReserve
— TypeStruct to add reserves to be larger than a specified requirement, with ramp constraints
For each service $s$ of the model type RampReserve
the following variables are created:
Variables:
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Default proportional cost: $1.0 / \text{SystemBasePower}$
- Symbol: $r_{d}$ for $d$ in contributing devices to the service $s$ If slacks are enabled:
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Default proportional cost: 1e5
- Symbol: $r^\text{sl}$
RampReserve
only accepts VariableReserve
PowerSystems.jl
type. With that, the parameters are:
Static Parameters
- $\text{TF}$ =
PowerSystems.get_time_frame(service)
- $R^\text{th,up}$ =
PowerSystems.get_ramp_limits(device).up
for thermal contributing devices - $R^\text{th,dn}$ =
PowerSystems.get_ramp_limits(device).down
for thermal contributing devices
Time Series Parameters
For a VariableReserve
PowerSystems
type:
Parameter | Default Time Series Name |
---|---|
RequirementTimeSeriesParameter | requirement |
Relevant Methods:
- $\mathcal{D}_s$ =
PowerSystems.get_contributing_devices(system, service)
: Set (vector) of all contributing devices to the service $s$ in the system.
Objective:
Add a large proportional cost to the objective function if slack variables are used $+ r^\text{sl} \cdot 10^5$. In addition adds the default cost for ActivePowerReserveVariables
as a proportional cost.
Expressions:
Adds the ActivePowerReserveVariable
for upper/lower bound expressions of contributing devices.
For ReserveUp
types, the variable is added to ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB
, such that this expression considers both the ActivePowerVariable
and its reserve variable. Similarly, For ReserveDown
types, the variable is added to ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB
, such that this expression considers both the ActivePowerVariable
and its reserve variable
Example: for a thermal unit $d$ contributing to two different ReserveUp
$s_1, s_2$ services (e.g. Reg-Up and Spin):
\[\text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB}_{t} = p_t^\text{th} + r_{s_1,t} + r_{s_2, t} \le P^\text{th,max}\]
similarly if $s_3$ is a ReserveDown
service (e.g. Reg-Down):
\[\text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB}_{t} = p_t^\text{th} - r_{s_3,t} \ge P^\text{th,min}\]
Constraints:
A RampReserve implements three fundamental constraints. The first is that the sum of all reserves of contributing devices must be larger than the RampReserve
requirement. Thus, for a service $s$:
\[\sum_{d\in\mathcal{D}_s} r_{d,t} + r_t^\text{sl} \ge \text{RequirementTimeSeriesParameter}_{t},\quad \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\}\]
Finally, there is a restriction based on the ramp limits of the contributing devices:
\[r_{d,t} \le R^\text{th,up} \cdot \text{TF}\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}_s, \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\}, \quad \text{(for ReserveUp)} \\ r_{d,t} \le R^\text{th,dn} \cdot \text{TF}\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}_s, \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\}, \quad \text{(for ReserveDown)}\]
NonSpinningReserve
PowerSimulations.NonSpinningReserve
— TypeStruct to add non spinning reserve requirements larger than specified requirement
For each service $s$ of the model type NonSpinningReserve
, the following variables are created:
Variables:
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Default proportional cost: $1.0 / \text{SystemBasePower}$
- Symbol: $r_{d}$ for $d$ in contributing devices to the service $s$ If slacks are enabled:
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Default proportional cost: 1e5
- Symbol: $r^\text{sl}$
NonSpinningReserve
only accepts VariableReserve
PowerSystems.jl
type. With that, the parameters are:
Static Parameters
- $\text{PF}$ =
PowerSystems.get_max_participation_factor(service)
- $\text{TF}$ =
PowerSystems.get_time_frame(service)
- $P^\text{th,min}$ =
PowerSystems.get_active_power_limits(device).min
for thermal contributing devices - $T^\text{st,up}$ =
PowerSystems.get_time_limits(d).up
for thermal contributing devices - $R^\text{th,up}$ =
PowerSystems.get_ramp_limits(device).down
for thermal contributing devices
Other parameters:
- $\Delta T$: Resolution of the problem in minutes.
Time Series Parameters
For a VariableReserve
PowerSystems
type:
| Parameter | Default Time Series Name |
Relevant Methods:
- $\mathcal{D}_s$ =
PowerSystems.get_contributing_devices(system, service)
: Set (vector) of all contributing devices to the service $s$ in the system.
Objective:
Add a large proportional cost to the objective function if slack variables are used $+ r^\text{sl} \cdot 10^5$. In addition adds the default cost for ActivePowerReserveVariables
as a proportional cost.
Expressions:
Adds the ActivePowerReserveVariable
for upper/lower bound expressions of contributing devices.
For ReserveUp
types, the variable is added to ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB
, such that this expression considers both the ActivePowerVariable
and its reserve variable. Similarly, For ReserveDown
types, the variable is added to ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB
, such that this expression considers both the ActivePowerVariable
and its reserve variable
Example: for a thermal unit $d$ contributing to two different ReserveUp
$s_1, s_2$ services (e.g. Reg-Up and Spin):
\[\text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB}_{t} = p_t^\text{th} + r_{s_1,t} + r_{s_2, t} \le P^\text{th,max}\]
similarly if $s_3$ is a ReserveDown
service (e.g. Reg-Down):
\[\text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB}_{t} = p_t^\text{th} - r_{s_3,t} \ge P^\text{th,min}\]
Constraints:
A NonSpinningReserve implements three fundamental constraints. The first is that the sum of all reserves of contributing devices must be larger than the NonSpinningReserve
requirement. Thus, for a service $s$:
\[\sum_{d\in\mathcal{D}_s} r_{d,t} + r_t^\text{sl} \ge \text{RequirementTimeSeriesParameter}_{t},\quad \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\}\]
In addition, there is a restriction on how much each contributing device $d$ can contribute to the requirement, based on the max participation factor allowed.
\[r_{d,t} \le \text{RequirementTimeSeriesParameter}_{t} \cdot \text{PF}\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}_s, \forall t\in \{1,\dots, T\},\]
Finally, there is a restriction based on the reserve response time for the non-spinning reserve if the unit is off. To do so, compute $R^\text{limit}_d$ as the reserve response limit as:
\[R^\text{limit}_d = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{ if TF } \le T^\text{st,up}_d \\ P^\text{th,min}_d + (\text{TF}_s - T^\text{st,up}_d) \cdot R^\text{th,up}_d \Delta T \cdot R^\text{th,up}_d & \text{ if TF } > T^\text{st,up}_d \end{cases}, \quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}_s\]
Then, the constraint depends on the commitment variable $u_t^\text{th}$ as:
\[r_{d,t} \le (1 - u_{d,t}^\text{th}) \cdot R^\text{limit}_d, \quad \forall d \in \mathcal{D}_s, \forall t \in \{1,\dots, T\}\]
ConstantMaxInterfaceFlow
This Service model only accepts the PowerSystems.jl
TransmissionInterface
type to properly function. It is used to model a collection of branches that make up an interface or corridor with a maximum transfer of power.
PowerSimulations.ConstantMaxInterfaceFlow
— TypeStruct to add a constant maximum transmission flow for specified interface
Variables
If slacks are used:
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Symbol: $f^\text{sl,up}$
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Symbol: $f^\text{sl,dn}$
Static Parameters
- $F^\text{max}$ =
PowerSystems.get_active_power_flow_limits(service).max
- $F^\text{min}$ =
PowerSystems.get_active_power_flow_limits(service).min
- $C^\text{flow}$ =
PowerSystems.get_violation_penalty(service)
- $\mathcal{M}_s$ =
PowerSystems.get_direction_mapping(service)
. Dictionary of contributing branches with its specified direction ($\text{Dir}_d = 1$ or $\text{Dir}_d = -1$) with respect to the interface.
Relevant Methods
- $\mathcal{D}_s$ =
PowerSystems.get_contributing_devices(system, service)
: Set (vector) of all contributing branches to the service $s$ in the system.
Objective:
Add the violation penalty proportional cost to the objective function if slack variables are used $+ (f^\text{sl,up} + f^\text{sl,dn}) \cdot C^\text{flow}$.
Expressions:
Creates the expression InterfaceTotalFlow
to keep track of all FlowActivePowerVariable
of contributing branches to the transmission interface.
Constraints:
It adds the constraint to limit the InterfaceTotalFlow
by the specified bounds of the service $s$:
\[F^\text{min} \le f^\text{sl,up}_t - f^\text{sl,dn}_t + \sum_{d\in\mathcal{D}_s} \text{Dir}_d f_{d,t} \le F^\text{max}, \quad \forall t \in \{1,\dots,T\}\]
VariableMaxInterfaceFlow
This Service model only accepts the PowerSystems.jl
TransmissionInterface
type to properly function. It is used to model a collection of branches that make up an interface or corridor with a maximum transfer of power.
PowerSimulations.VariableMaxInterfaceFlow
— TypeStruct to add a variable maximum transmission flow for specified interface
Variables
If slacks are used:
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Symbol: $f^\text{sl,up}$
- Bounds: [0.0, ]
- Symbol: $f^\text{sl,dn}$
Static Parameters
- $F^\text{max}$ =
PowerSystems.get_active_power_flow_limits(service).max
- $F^\text{min}$ =
PowerSystems.get_active_power_flow_limits(service).min
- $C^\text{flow}$ =
PowerSystems.get_violation_penalty(service)
- $\mathcal{M}_s$ =
PowerSystems.get_direction_mapping(service)
. Dictionary of contributing branches with its specified direction ($\text{Dir}_d = 1$ or $\text{Dir}_d = -1$) with respect to the interface.
Time Series Parameters
For a TransmissionInterface
PowerSystems
type:
Parameter | Default Time Series Name |
---|---|
PowerSimulations.MaxInterfaceFlowLimitParameter | max_active_power_flow_limit |
PowerSimulations.MinInterfaceFlowLimitParameter | min_active_power_flow_limit |
Relevant Methods
- $\mathcal{D}_s$ =
PowerSystems.get_contributing_devices(system, service)
: Set (vector) of all contributing branches to the service $s$ in the system.
Objective:
Add the violation penalty proportional cost to the objective function if slack variables are used $+ (f^\text{sl,up} + f^\text{sl,dn}) \cdot C^\text{flow}$.
Expressions:
Creates the expression InterfaceTotalFlow
to keep track of all FlowActivePowerVariable
of contributing branches to the transmission interface.
Constraints:
It adds the constraint to limit the InterfaceTotalFlow
by the specified bounds of the service $s$:
\[F^\text{min} \cdot \text{MinInterfaceFlowLimitParameter}_t \le f^\text{sl,up}_t - f^\text{sl,dn}_t + \sum_{d\in\mathcal{D}_s} \text{Dir}_d f_{d,t} \le F^\text{max}\cdot \text{MaxInterfaceFlowLimitParameter}_t, \quad \forall t \in \{1,\dots,T\}\]
Changes on Expressions due to Service models
It is important to note that by adding a service to a Optimization Problem, variables for each contributing device must be created. For example, for every contributing generator $d \in \mathcal{D}$ that is participating in services $s_1,s_2,s_3$, it is required to create three set of ActivePowerReserveVariable
variables:
\[r_{s_1,d,t},~ r_{s_2,d,t},~ r_{s_3,d,t},\quad \forall d \in \mathcal{D}, \forall t \in \{1,\dots, T\}\]
Changes on UpperBound (UB) and LowerBound (LB) limits
Each contributing generator $d$ has active power limits that the reserve variables affect. In simple terms, the limits are implemented using expressions ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB
and ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB
as:
\[\text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionUB}_t \le P^\text{max} \\ \text{ActivePowerRangeExpressionLB}_t \ge P^\text{min}\]
ReserveUp
type variables contribute to the upper bound expression, while ReserveDown
variables contribute to the lower bound expressions. So if $s_1,s_2$ are ReserveUp
services, and $s_3$ is a ReserveDown
service, then for a thermal generator $d$ using a ThermalStandardDispatch
:
\[\begin{align*} & p_{d,t}^\text{th} + r_{s_1,d,t} + r_{s_2,d,t} \le P^\text{th,max},\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}^\text{th}, \forall t \in \{1,\dots,T\} \\ & p_{d,t}^\text{th} - r_{s_3,d,t} \ge P^\text{th,min},\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}^\text{th}, \forall t \in \{1,\dots,T\} \end{align*}\]
while for a renewable generator $d$ using a RenewableFullDispatch
:
\[\begin{align*} & p_{d,t}^\text{re} + r_{s_1,d,t} + r_{s_2,d,t} \le \text{ActivePowerTimeSeriesParameter}_t,\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}^\text{re}, \forall t \in \{1,\dots,T\}\\ & p_{d,t}^\text{re} - r_{s_3,d,t} \ge 0,\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}^\text{re}, \forall t \in \{1,\dots,T\} \end{align*}\]
Changes in Ramp limits
For the case of Ramp Limits (of formulation that model these limits), the reserve variables only affect the current time, and not the previous time. Then, for the same example as before:
\[\begin{align*} & p_{d,t}^\text{th} + r_{s_1,d,t} + r_{s_2,d,t} - p_{d,t-1}^\text{th}\le R^\text{th,up},\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}^\text{th}, \forall t \in \{1,\dots,T\}\\ & p_{d,t}^\text{th} - r_{s_3,d,t} - p_{d,t-1}^\text{th} \ge -R^\text{th,dn},\quad \forall d\in \mathcal{D}^\text{th}, \forall t \in \{1,\dots,T\} \end{align*}\]